 |
| Beijing in mornng |
The readings are of particles rated as PM2.5 (PM stands for particulate matter), but two.5 micrometers in size or concerning 1/30th the average width of somebody's hair. The figures were being posted on Beijing's environmental monitoring centre website. This size of particle can penetrate deep into the lungs, therefore measuring them is considered a more accurate reflection of air quality than different strategies.
It is the primary time Beijing has publicly revealed PM2.5 data and follows a social networking clamour by citizens.
The US embassy measures PM2.5 from a device on its rooftop and releases the results. Some residents have tested the air around their neighbourhoods and posted the results on-line.The Beijing monitoring centre's website said it was releasing hourly readings of PM2.5 that were taken from one monitoring site concerning four miles (7km) west of Tiananmen square. It said the info was for research purposes and therefore the public ought to solely use it as a reference.
The reading at noon Saturday was 0.015 milligrams per cubic metre, which would be classed as "good" for a 24-hour exposure at that level, consistent with US Environmental Protection Agency standards.
The US embassy reading taken from its site on the eastern fringe of downtown Beijing said its noon reading was "moderate." Its readings are posted on Twitter.
Beijing interprets air quality using less stringent standards than the US Embassy, therefore usually when the govt. says pollution is "light" the embassy terms it "hazardous."
Steven Andrews, an environmental consultant who has studied Beijing's pollution data since 2006, said he was "already to a small degree suspicious" of Beijing's PM2.5 data. in the 24 hours to noon Saturday seven of the Beijing monitoring centre's hourly figures were "at the terribly low level" of 0.003 milligrams per cubic metre.
"In all of 2010 and 2011 the US embassy reported values at or below that level solely 18 times out of over fifteen,000 hourly values or concerning 0.1% of the time," Andrews said. "PM2.5 concentrations vary by space therefore a direct comparison between sites is not possible, however the numbers being reported during some hours seem surpisingly low."
The Beijing centre says it has six sites that may check for PM2.5 and twenty seven that may check for the larger, coarser PM10 particles that are thought-about less hazardous. the middle is predicted to shop for equipment and build more monitoring sites to test for PM2.5.
Beijing isn't expected to include PM2.5 in its daily roundups of the air quality any time soon. Those disclosures, for instance "light" or "serious", are primarily based on the quantity of PM10, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide in the air.
"There has been tremendous amounts of attention in the Chinese media whichever newspaper you decide up, whichever radio station you listen to, channel you watch they are all talking concerning PM2.5 and how levels are therefore high," Andrews said.
"What has been therefore powerful is that people are sceptical, and that i assume rightly sceptical [about the government's descriptions of data]," he said.
